|
Poslao: 08 Nov 2011 02:06
|
offline
- sevenino
- Ugledni građanin
- Pridružio: 14 Jun 2011
- Poruke: 399
|
nije mi jasno kako ovo radi, kako ja shvatam izmjeri daljinu do cilja npr. 565m i nanisani iznad cilja i ukuca negdje na tastaruri 566? i granata eksplodira na toj daljini i pobije ove ispod??? Nema sto mocno oruzje, ako je tako. Kolika je stvarna moc granate 25 mm, jer ona se opet radijalno rasprskava i znaci protivnik je zasut evtl. jednom osminom punjenja? Cisto sumnjam da tu postoji ucinak na borbenim vozilima, nekako mi premalo. Elektronici svaka cast,ali ipak na kraju celik je taj koji neutralise. Imao sam priliku da opalim samo dva metka kalibra .50 (12,7) i bubrezi mi zamijenili mjesta, a to je upola manje nego ovo mogu mislit kako trza kad moze dobacit 700 m. To mi nekako nemoguce,.
|
|
|
|
|
Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
|
|
|
Poslao: 08 Nov 2011 02:52
|
offline
- Toni

- SuperModerator
- Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
- Poruke: 33595
|
Ugradjeni laserski daljinomer odredjuje daljinu do mete. Granata dobija podatak a zna koliko metara je preletela prateci koliko je rotacija izvrsila do tada(sad koliko preleti za jednu rotaciju...). Ti mozes da podesis kada da eksplodira u odnosu na metu. Ranije-kasnije...
Ovo je za unistavanje zive sile koja je iza nekog zaklona. Prvenstveno. Nije za razaranje necega. Kalibar je dobar. Nemoze veci.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 08 Nov 2011 12:36
|
offline
- vrabac
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 30 Dec 2010
- Poruke: 4957
|
Tempiranj projektila da rokne na tačno određenoj daljini nije problem uopšte sa današnjom elektronikom.
Pravo pitanje je kako da pogodi tamo gde jenanišanio jer ovakvo zrno ima sigurno dobro zakrivljenu putnaju do 700 m. Dakle pitanje je da li unutar tog nišana i ma i mali računar balistički koji daje strelcu oznaku koliko da podigne nišan iznad cilja? Il nisam dobro odgledao snimak?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 08 Nov 2011 12:57
|
offline
- walther45

- Počasni građanin
- Pridružio: 28 Feb 2009
- Poruke: 871
- Gde živiš: najlipsi grad na svitu
|
dzabe im je sve kad tamo ima jos tisuca i tisuca nepismenih talibana koji cuce iz kamena sa AK47 u ruci
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 08 Nov 2011 13:23
|
offline
- Pridružio: 03 Okt 2011
- Poruke: 3574
- Gde živiš: Tanhauser Gate
|
dino ::jaooj ti amerikanci moraaju da imaju svoje....nikad da uzmu nesto konkretno tudje i da cuvaju kao pola svijeta cccc sad ce isto i iz tre puske bit milion verzija pa koja ce bit najbolja pa ovo pa ono.... bljak vid joj oblika...misiim uzas
paaaaa....durandal nije americki al se kod njih zove BLU-107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 30 Avg 2016 22:44
|
offline
- Toni

- SuperModerator
- Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
- Poruke: 33595
|
DoD IG: Army should buy or cancel XM25, no more development
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
Citat:Army officials deployed prototype XM25 systems to Afghanistan as part of a 'forward operational assessment' from November 2010 to April 2012, and then sent another set in January 2013.
The weapons were popular with squad-level units as its enfilading fire reportedly helped shorten the duration of attacks on coalition outposts because troops did not have to wait for fire support to engage adversaries taking cover. However, the effort was delayed largely by what DoD IG classified as inadequate training, which resulted in several malfunctions, one that injured a soldier when one of the airburst rounds already in the chamber was prematurely ignited after another round was 'double fed'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 17 Avg 2018 11:19
|
offline
- Toni

- SuperModerator
- Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
- Poruke: 33595
|
Ipak ugasen projekat
The Army's Futuristic 'Punisher' Grenade Launcher Is Officially Dead, But It Could Rise Again
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
Citat:In principle, the new grenade launcher, even by itself, could have significantly improved the capabilities and flexibility of grenadiers in an Army infantry squad to engage various targets at longer ranges, behind hard cover or inside buildings. Unfortunately, experiments and field tests with prototype weapons exposed serious drawbacks with the concept.
For one, as with infantry grenade launchers historically, the Army found that the XM25 had little capability to engage targets at close range. Dedicated rounds for short-range targets were a possibility, but it could have been hard for troops to quickly swap between them in combat. This was an immediate problem since the service had intended for troops to use them as their primary weapon and not carry a backup, such as an M4 carbine.
The 14-pound system – almost twice the weight of a standard M4 – was too bulky to allow soldiers to realistically lug around a secondary weapon, anyway, and also limited how much ammunition they could take with them. It was also expensive, complex, and potentially too sensitive to the rigors of combat.
In February 2013, an Army special operator in Afghanistan suffered minor injuries when their Punisher malfunctioned. This was the third potentially serious incident involving the weapon since June 2011. Thankfully safety features built into the grenade itself prevented it from exploding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 26 Avg 2018 14:54
|
offline
- aramis s

- SuperModerator
- Pridružio: 18 Jul 2007
- Poruke: 29352
- Gde živiš: iznad smoga Beograda
|
Ma naravno, tolka komplikacija za metak 25mm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 21 Avg 2025 19:54
|
offline
- Toni

- SuperModerator
- Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
- Poruke: 33595
|
Citat:Live-fire testing of the New mock-up of the XM25 “Counter Defilade Target Engagement System” equipped with the XM157 fire-control system
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
|
|
|
|
|
|