Rusija smanjuje broj tenkova

2

Rusija smanjuje broj tenkova

offline
  • Pridružio: 12 Feb 2007
  • Poruke: 8271

Zorge ::Праве места за нешто "комплитли диферент".

A što me to ne čudi. Rusija je i onako krenula da smanjuje sve rodove vojske malo pomalo, jer su uvideli da im je preskupo ovo što su do sada radili, Mornarica je prepuna zarđalih podmornica i brodova, avijacija prepuna istrošenih aviona, (bio sam postovao ovde slike kako trunu MiG-29 i još neki drugi avioni na aerodromu u okolini Moskve. Na avionima i dalje stoje rakete.), kopnena vojska je takođe prepuna tenkova i borbenih vozila koja nisu upotrebljiva.

Rešili su da pređu na opremu koja je ubojitija i preciznija i jeftinija za održavanje.



Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
offline
  • Pridružio: 08 Sep 2005
  • Poruke: 5739

Ovo donosi rzumljiv odgovor:

16:0203/07/2009

MOSCOW. (RIA Novosti military commentator Ilya Kramnik) - Russia is currently undergoing a controversial military reform. The entirely new troop structure and tables of organization are being hotly debated. Recent media reports concerning planned tank force reductions have triggered various comments, including panicky predictions.

Media articles quoting Interfax reports involving an anonymous Defense Ministry source say the tank force will be reduced more than ten-fold, namely, from over 20,000 tanks to just 2,000 tanks. The news has sparked off a heated debate.

However, all sensational aspects disappear if we study the situation more closely. Although the tank force will be reduced and overhauled substantially, the reform does not envision ten-fold cuts.

At present the Russian Army has about 22,000 tanks, including more than 15,000 at storehouses. This makes up for just over 6,000 combat-ready tanks. Permanent readiness units have between 1,000 and 1,500 tanks.

In the next ten years, army divisions will be replaced with permanent readiness brigades and battalions operating 2,000 to 2,300 combat-ready main battle tanks whose number will increase somewhat. Training units will have several hundred more tanks. Another 3,000-4,000 tanks will remain at storehouses. Consequently, the Russian Army will have a total of 6,000 to 7,000 tanks.

Although the Russian tank force will be reduced three-fold, the specifications of operational tanks, the qualitative and quantitative gap between Russia and its theoretical enemies and the reform's long-term effect on national defense capability remain unclear.

The Russian industrial situation makes it possible to clarify the first aspect. The T-90 main battle tank, a modified version of the T-72 tank, is currently being manufactured for the Russian Army. The T-72 modernization program will bring these tanks up to the current standard. As a result, T-64 and T-80 tanks featuring numerous Ukrainian-made components will have to be scrapped.

The T-72 and its successor, the T-90, will probably form the mainstay of the Russian tank force. Production of the T-95 tank, due to be unveiled in 2009, could be launched in the next two or three years.

But how will Russia's tank force compare with those of neighboring countries? Virtually all major powers plan to reduce their tank units many times over.

NATO forces in Europe will retain about 2,000 combat-ready tanks and will store another 2,000 by 2020.

China will have about 4,000 to 5,000 tanks, including 2,000 modern tanks, by 2020. Although the Russian tank force will be dwarfed by those of its two most powerful neighbors, NATO and China, it is highly unlikely that Moscow will have to simultaneously fight both of them. Such a hypothetical conflict would inevitably escalate into a nuclear war. Consequently, the role played by tank units would diminish greatly.

Although anti-tank weapons are being improved all the time, tanks still dominate the battlefield due to their firepower, mobility and thick armor. Tanks remain a vital asset enhancing the flexibility, mobility and firepower of army units during local conflicts.

The opinions expressed in this article are the author's and do not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.



online
  • RJ 
  • SuperModerator
  • Gavrilo Milentijević
  • Komandir stanice milicije Gornje Polje
  • Pridružio: 12 Feb 2005
  • Poruke: 32997
  • Gde živiš: ovalni kabinet

Ruski premijer posetio pogone Ural zavoda - namenske vojne proizvodnje gde mu je prezentovana najnovija oklopna tehnika....

offline
  • kljift 
  • Legendarni građanin
  • Pridružio: 11 Okt 2009
  • Poruke: 6687
























Rusima velik broj tenkova nije toliko potreban. Neće više da idu u osvajanja. Više su zainteresovani za vozila BMP 3 i njegove derivate. Mada Rusi moraju da razmišljaju o Ukrajini, Bjelorusiji, Avganistanu možda i Iranu svim onim zemljama gdje bi im gomila tenkova bila neophodna za probijanje linije. Ali takva scenarija su malo vjerovatna i Rusi neće ulaziti u takve sukobe. Mada ja lično smatram da rashodovanje T 64 i T 72 tenkova nije ničim opravdano. Te mašine i dalje mogu da budu u igri ili barem dio igre. Jer Rusi sa stokovima tih tenkova i druge opreme mogu da budu jedina adresa za mnoge zemlje kojima su potrebne velike količine kvalitetnog naoružanja koje nema finansijsku već neku drugu cijenu.

offline
  • Pridružio: 10 Sep 2009
  • Poruke: 979

strašno na šta je silan rad radnika i brdo novaca i vremena otislo ? u staro zeljezo,pepo i prah,jel barem koristilo svrsi ? nije ni to...nadam se da ce se Ruje opametiti ovog puta.Kad uzmes u obzir sta si sve sa tom lovom mogao napraviti dodi da se poceskas po glavi...

offline
  • kljift 
  • Legendarni građanin
  • Pridružio: 11 Okt 2009
  • Poruke: 6687

Jigsaw6 ::strašno na šta je silan rad radnika i brdo novaca i vremena otislo ? u staro zeljezo,pepo i prah,jel barem koristilo svrsi ? nije ni to...nadam se da ce se Ruje opametiti ovog puta.Kad uzmes u obzir sta si sve sa tom lovom mogao napraviti dodi da se poceskas po glavi...

Svi na kraju završe u staro željezo. A pravljeni su da nikad ne bi bili upotrijebljeni!

offline
  • Pridružio: 28 Sep 2009
  • Poruke: 1453
  • Gde živiš: U Belomgradu

Mislim da su Ruje ipak bili malo neiskreni u cifri koliko god da objave da su smanjili (da bi se drugi opustili) u nekom steku podzemnom bunkeru ima da stoji jos 1000 Tenkova spremnih za dejstva..Mislim da se ovakve stvari ipak neobjavljuju javno celom svetu a da imas jake protivnike pored sebe..Neka navlaka je ovo..Mada verujem da smanjuju,smanjuju..

offline
  • Pridružio: 07 Nov 2007
  • Poruke: 8422
  • Gde živiš: Ravni Banat

1000?

Ено код Новосибирска џеџи конзервирано око 5000 комада.

offline
  • Pridružio: 28 Sep 2009
  • Poruke: 1453
  • Gde živiš: U Belomgradu

Zorge ::1000?

Ено код Новосибирска џеџи конзервирано око 5000 комада.

Eto kazem ja samo sam se malo zezno oko cifre (tacnije lupio sam)...Hoce neko da mi kaze da ce i tih 5000 da rasture..Aha sigurno..Mozda da imaju Tadica za Ministra Odbrane,ovako NIKAKO..

offline
  • nokia 
  • Ugledni građanin
  • Pridružio: 29 Sep 2008
  • Poruke: 420

U današnje vrijeme tko god da bi napao Rusiju a da ima dovoljno snage za uspjeh mora očekivati nuklearni odgovor.
Za sve ostale države 2000 tenkova je dovoljna količina za uspješnu obranu.
U današnje vrijeme u cijelom svijetu ima samo dvadesetak država sa više od 500 tenkova.

Ko je trenutno na forumu
 

Ukupno su 640 korisnika na forumu :: 26 registrovanih, 4 sakrivenih i 610 gosta   ::   [ Administrator ] [ Supermoderator ] [ Moderator ] :: Detaljnije

Najviše korisnika na forumu ikad bilo je 2918 - dana 22 Nov 2019 07:48

Korisnici koji su trenutno na forumu:
Korisnici trenutno na forumu: A.R.Chafee.Jr., AF-1, bankulen, danilopu, darkangel, helen1, kaisarevic1, krlebgd77, Lord Nem, Mercury, Misirac, Miskohd, Mixelotti, naki011, Polemarchoi, Recce, RJ, rovac, ruma, saputnik plavetnila, Tas011, trajkoni018, ucenik32, virked, Warhawk, zixmix