Ukrajina kao novo globalno odmeravanje snaga, 2014, 2015, 2016. godina

1853

Ukrajina kao novo globalno odmeravanje snaga, 2014, 2015, 2016. godina

offline
  • Pridružio: 29 Sep 2006
  • Poruke: 421

http://hr.rbth.com/politics/2014/12/01/bataljun_sm.....31527.html

Bataljun "Smrt": zašto Čečeni ratuju za proruske dobrovoljce na istoku Ukrajine


"Što vi ovdje konkretno radite?", pitam ih.
"Izlazimo na prvu liniju fronte", kaže Aptio. "Odlazimo i na Donjecki aerodrom. Ovdje u garnizonu pretovarujemo opremu, odmaramo se i razvozimo kruh."
...Na vježbalištu garnizona okuplja se bataljun "Smrt" na postrojavanje. Apti i Vaha staju u sredinu. Iza njihovih leđa vidi se jesenje drveće. Vidi se i jezero. Sada magla nad njim zaklanja suprotnu obalu. Stinger kao navijen juri po vježbalištu i zapovijeda. S podignutim kažiprstom uzvikuje: "Allahu akbar!" Mnogo ruku se podiže uvis. "Allahu akbar!", Odgovaraju svi uglas. I tako tri puta. Iza svih ostalih stoji General. Magla se polako širi i kao da mu podupire leđa. A on se osmjehuje.



Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
offline
  • Pridružio: 26 Apr 2014
  • Poruke: 2136

http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/bulgarian-nationa.....d-eu-exit/
Неке нове идеје у Бугарској. Брзо је дошло до засићења са ЕУ и НАТО

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7a1_1417955233
И у Украјини долази до засићења са Порошенком



offline
  • pein 
  • Legendarni građanin
  • Pridružio: 09 Jan 2012
  • Poruke: 32325

nikišino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Q6HqYRPozQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OndkbOP_CSc

offline
  • Pridružio: 14 Jul 2014
  • Poruke: 837

Luhansk nije vise na Električnu mrežu Ukrajine priključen. Sada dobiva struju iz Rusije. Javlja rusvesna.su
Možda bi sad bilo vrijeme Schastye zauzet?

offline
  • Pridružio: 19 Jul 2012
  • Poruke: 1096
  • Gde živiš: Banja Luka

RUSKI VOJNI EKSPERT: Kad sa 10.000 tenkova krenemo na NATO, Kosovo osvajamo zajedno sa Srbijom
http://www.kurir.rs/planeta/ruski-vojni-ekspert-ka.....ak-1631010

offline
  • Pridružio: 19 Jun 2014
  • Poruke: 1401

http://www.vineyardsaker.co.nz/2014/12/06/the-us-c.....on-russia/

THE US CONGRESS HAS DECLARED WAR ON RUSSIA

I can’t emphasize enough how terrifying – and stupid – this is.

And now it’s official.

House Resolution 758 was approved yesterday by an overwhelming, bipartisan 411-10 score at the US Congress.

See the vote breakdown here:
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/113-2014/h548

This resolution, rushed to a vote only two weeks after it was introduced, depicts Russia as an “Aggressor Nation” which has invaded Ukraine and was behind the downing of MH-17.

The resolution virtually calls for war on Russia.

Take a very good look at the language:

The President of the United States, in consultation with the US Congress, must…

“conduct a review of the force posture, readiness, and responsibilities of the United States Armed Forces and the forces of other members of NATO to determine if the contributions and actions of each is sufficient to meet the obligations of collective self defense under article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty and to specify the measures needed to remedy any deficiencies” .

Translation: the US Congress wants the Empire of Chaos to use NATO’s collective security doctrine under article 5 (an attack on one member is an attack on all members) to advance a war on Russia, even though Ukraine is not a member (but will soon become a major non-NATO ally).

The resolution now goes to the Senate.

If it becomes law, the resolution allows the President of the United States to declare war on Russia bypassing the formal permission of Capitol Hill.

The lame duck wouldn’t have the balls. But the Hillarator will.



I onda...

http://www.vineyardsaker.co.nz/2014/12/06/reckless.....-ron-paul/

Citat:
RECKLESS CONGRESS JUST ‘DECLARED WAR’ ON RUSSIA, BY RON PAUL

Yesterday the US House passed what I consider to be one of the worst pieces of legislation ever. H. Res. 758 was billed as a resolution “strongly condemning the actions of the Russian Federation, under President Vladimir Putin, which has carried out a policy of aggression against neighboring countries aimed at political and economic domination.”

In fact, the bill was 16 pages of war propaganda that should have made even neocons blush, if they were capable of such a thing.

These are the kinds of resolutions I have always watched closely in Congress, as what are billed as “harmless” statements of opinion often lead to sanctions and war. I remember in 1998 arguing strongly against the Iraq Liberation Act because, as I said at the time, I knew it would lead to war. I did not oppose the Act because I was an admirer of Saddam Hussein – just as now I am not an admirer of Putin or any foreign political leader – but rather because I knew then that another war against Iraq would not solve the problems and would probably make things worse. We all know what happened next.

That is why I can hardly believe they are getting away with it again, and this time with even higher stakes: provoking a war with Russia that could result in total destruction!

If anyone thinks I am exaggerating about how bad this resolution really is, let me just offer a few examples from the legislation itself:

[Please click below to continue reading]

The resolution (paragraph 3) accuses Russia of an invasion of Ukraine and condemns Russia’s violation of Ukrainian sovereignty. The statement is offered without any proof of such a thing. Surely with our sophisticated satellites that can read a license plate from space we should have video and pictures of this Russian invasion. None have been offered. As to Russia’s violation of Ukrainian sovereignty, why isn’t it a violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty for the US to participate in the overthrow of that country’s elected government as it did in February? We have all heard the tapes of State Department officials plotting with the US Ambassador in Ukraine to overthrow the government. We heard US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland bragging that the US spent $5 billion on regime change in Ukraine. Why is that OK?

The resolution (paragraph 11) accuses the people in east Ukraine of holding “fraudulent and illegal elections” in November. Why is it that every time elections do not produce the results desired by the US government they are called “illegal” and “fraudulent”? Aren’t the people of eastern Ukraine allowed self-determination? Isn’t that a basic human right?

The resolution (paragraph 13) demands a withdrawal of Russia forces from Ukraine even though the US government has provided no evidence the Russian army was ever in Ukraine. This paragraph also urges the government in Kiev to resume military operations against the eastern regions seeking independence.

The resolution (paragraph 14) states with certainty that the Malaysia Airlines flight 17 that crashed in Ukraine was brought down by a missile “fired by Russian-backed separatist forces in eastern Ukraine.” This is simply incorrect, as the final report on the investigation of this tragedy will not even be released until next year and the preliminary report did not state that a missile brought down the plane. Neither did the preliminary report – conducted with the participation of all countries involved – assign blame to any side.

Paragraph 16 of the resolution condemns Russia for selling arms to the Assad government in Syria. It does not mention, of course, that those weapons are going to fight ISIS – which we claim is the enemy — while the US weapons supplied to the rebels in Syria have actually found their way into the hands of ISIS!

Paragraph 17 of the resolution condemns Russia for what the US claims are economic sanctions (“coercive economic measures”) against Ukraine. This even though the US has repeatedly hit Russia with economic sanctions and is considering even more!

The resolution (paragraph 22) states that Russia invaded the Republic of Georgia in 2008. This is simply untrue. Even the European Union – no friend of Russia – concluded in its investigation of the events in 2008 that it was Georgia that “started an unjustified war” against Russia not the other way around! How does Congress get away with such blatant falsehoods? Do Members not even bother to read these resolutions before voting?

In paragraph 34 the resolution begins to even become comical, condemning the Russians for what it claims are attacks on computer networks of the United States and “illicitly acquiring information” about the US government. In the aftermath of the Snowden revelations about the level of US spying on the rest of the world, how can the US claim the moral authority to condemn such actions in others?

Chillingly, the resolution singles out Russian state-funded media outlets for attack, claiming that they “distort public opinion.” The US government, of course, spends billions of dollars worldwide to finance and sponsor media outlets including Voice of America and RFE/RL, as well as to subsidize “independent” media in countless counties overseas. How long before alternative information sources like RT are banned in the United States? This legislation brings us closer to that unhappy day when the government decides the kind of programming we can and cannot consume – and calls such a violation “freedom.”

The resolution gives the green light (paragraph 45) to Ukrainian President Poroshenko to re-start his military assault on the independence-seeking eastern provinces, urging the “disarming of separatist and paramilitary forces in eastern Ukraine.” Such a move will mean many more thousands of dead civilians.

To that end, the resolution directly involves the US government in the conflict by calling on the US president to “provide the government of Ukraine with lethal and non-lethal defense articles, services, and training required to effectively defend its territory and sovereignty.” This means US weapons in the hands of US-trained military forces engaged in a hot war on the border with Russia. Does that sound at all like a good idea?

There are too many more ridiculous and horrific statements in this legislation to completely discuss. Probably the single most troubling part of this resolution, however, is the statement that “military intervention” by the Russian Federation in Ukraine “poses a threat to international peace and security.” Such terminology is not an accident: this phrase is the poison pill planted in this legislation from which future, more aggressive resolutions will follow. After all, if we accept that Russia is posing a “threat” to international peace how can such a thing be ignored? These are the slippery slopes that lead to war.

This dangerous legislation passed today, December 4, with only ten (!) votes against! Only ten legislators are concerned over the use of blatant propaganda and falsehoods to push such reckless saber-rattling toward Russia.

Here are the Members who voted “NO” on this legislation. If you do not see your own Representative on this list call and ask why they are voting to bring us closer to war with Russia! If you do see your Representative on the below list, call and thank him or her for standing up to the warmongers.

Voting “NO” on H. Res. 758:

1) Justin Amash (R-MI)
2) John Duncan (R-TN)
3) Alan Grayson, (D-FL)
4) Alcee Hastings (D-FL)
5) Walter Jones (R-NC)
6) Thomas Massie (R-KY)
7) Jim McDermott (D-WA)
8 George Miller (D-CA)
9) Beto O’Rourke (D-TX)
10 Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA)


EDIT:

U vezi linka koji je okacio Sr.Stat.

Zadnjih par recenica:

Citat: Против свих нас пуштају „у рад“ тешке методе напада.
То је почетак правог рата. Баш правог.
Американци желе да он буде кратак.


Ne svidja mi se kako se kockice slazu...

offline
  • Pridružio: 18 Feb 2006
  • Poruke: 114
  • Gde živiš: Batajnica

Citat:Шеф локалне извршне власти Александар Олејњик изјавио је да иза јуриша стоји Русија и да је организован „у режији Кремља”.
fakti.org/globotpor/quo-vadis-orbi/puca-i-z.....t-u-vinici

offline
  • Pridružio: 19 Feb 2006
  • Poruke: 11156
  • Gde živiš: Banja Luka

@...

"Divlje guske" kratko zive.
Clanak o strancima na novoruskom ratistu.
Citat:Iz celog sveta su u Novorusiju stigle profesionalne ubice-plaćenici, ali oni ne mogu da pobede dobrovoljce (miliciju) i njihove drugove, tvrdi naš dopisnik iz Moskve Viktor Hlistun, koji o tome ima informacije iz prve ruke
http://www.magazin-tabloid.com/casopis/?id=06&br=319&cl=32

offline
  • pein 
  • Legendarni građanin
  • Pridružio: 09 Jan 2012
  • Poruke: 32325

Кијев спреман за децентрализацију
http://www.rts.rs/page/stories/ci/story/2/С&.....1091;.html
film o tome kako je i ko oborio malezijski boing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0wEZ-bWWsQ
spominju se ukropi izgleda su opolčenci dobili uniforme sa zimskom šarom
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKAp7AIpdN8
motorola ekskurzija po novorsiji Very Happy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mFDQrEF_Wg
stigli dobrovoljci iz sibira u donbas na stranu opolčenaca naravno
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_yNwfi5fM0
Solntsevo - The Largest Abandoned Military Base
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cp7DARW886g

offline
  • Mačak
  • Zavarivač
  • Pridružio: 30 Dec 2011
  • Poruke: 2596
  • Gde živiš: Čačak

Opet pada grad

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Q2skUSmKro

Ko je trenutno na forumu
 

Ukupno su 670 korisnika na forumu :: 10 registrovanih, 2 sakrivenih i 658 gosta   ::   [ Administrator ] [ Supermoderator ] [ Moderator ] :: Detaljnije

Najviše korisnika na forumu ikad bilo je 3195 - dana 09 Nov 2023 14:47

Korisnici koji su trenutno na forumu:
Korisnici trenutno na forumu: Bobrock1, cikadeda, dejoglina, DPera, Kruger, mikki jons, novator, Parker, repac, slonic_tonic