Iran

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

@mrki001

Gde nadje da poredis Scud i V-2 sa najnovijim balistickim raketama kraceg dometa? Imaju one dovoljnu preciznost pogotovo ako nose kasetnu bojevu glavu.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

First, in May 2010, Turkey, working with Brazil, signed an agreement with Iran whereby Iran could ship 1,200 kilograms of low-enriched uranium to Turkey for safekeeping in exchange for fuel rods enriched to a higher level of 20 percent, for use in a medical research reactor.7 Further indicating a split with NATO Allies on Iran‟s nuclear program, during the agreement‟s announcement, Turkey‟s and Brazil‟s Foreign Ministers condemned any new sanctions against Iran and said Iran has a right to a “full nuclear fuel cycle, including enrichment.”8
Second, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has argued that Iran‟s nuclear program is for peaceful purposes saying, “Iran does not accept it is building a weapon. They are working on nuclear power for the purposes of energy only.”9 Further, when the fourth round of UNSC sanctions against Iran was introduced in June 2010, Turkey, a non-permanent Security Council member, voted against the measure. However, Turkey has said it will enforce UNSC sanctions against Iran.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Jeste da su Kinezi ali cisto da se shvati koliko su napredovale rakete:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0HCJq6B1wZA/Sd10jhjJjiI/.....TRANGE.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0HCJq6B1wZA/Sd10jEao82I/.....DETAIL.jpg

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Napisano: 23 Sep 2011 10:34

toliko o turskoj,a ksa ima problema dovljno i sada tako da im najmanje treba bijes šita,kojih i tamo ima pozamašan broj.

Dopuna: 23 Sep 2011 10:41

@ mean_machine
u pravu si ,smatra se da rakete tipa iskander,koje su rusi nudili arapima i iranu kao zamjena za omijlene u arapskom svijetu scud-ove,mogu koristiti za izravne napade na položaje pvo i u njihovom slućaju na položaje pac3/arow/2

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Iskander mora biti blizu antibalistickih sistema jer mu je domet mali. Prednost Iskandera nad ostalim balistickim raketama je u putanji. Ne leti po hiperboli pa antibalisticki sistemi nisu efikasni protiv takvog resenja.

Ono sto je na linkovima je dejstvo neke vece kineske balisticke rakete.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Napisano: 23 Sep 2011 10:54

At the outbreak of the Gulf War, Iraq had an effective, if limited, ballistic missile force. Besides the original Scud-B, several local variants had been developed. These included the Al-Hussein, developed during the Iran–Iraq War, the Al-Hijarah, a shortened Al-Hussein, and the Al-Abbas, an extended-range Scud fired from fixed launching sites, that was never used. The Soviet-built MAZ-543 vehicle was the prime launcher, along with a few locally-designed TELs, the Al Nida and the Al Waleed.

Scuds were responsible for most of the coalition deaths outside of Iraq and Kuwait. 42 Scud missiles in total were fired into Israel.[25] They killed one Israeli directly and one Saudi security guard. Twenty-eight members of the Pennsylvania National Guard were killed when one struck a United States Army barracks in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.[26]
scud-b ima daleko manje razornu bojevu glavu od iranski raketa,ćak i oni tipovi koji su nastali iz scud-c/d -šahab 1/2 imaju veće i preciznije bojeve glave.

Dopuna: 23 Sep 2011 10:56

@mean_machine
ma znam ali recimo da bi bili idealni za dejstvo iz sirije/libana

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Ali Iskander niko u regionu nije kupio.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Napisano: 23 Sep 2011 11:11

što se scud-ova tiće jedino scud-d se mže koristiti za preciznije napade na baze aerodrome ..itd.Što se tiće irana oni vjerovatno drže svoje kao prijetjna za us baze u iraku u ev. napadu,jer upraksi u iraku se pokazalo da je mobilne lansere skoro nemoguće uništiti.
Characteristics
NATO codename Scud-A Scud-B Scud-C Scud-D
U.S. DIA SS-1b SS-1c SS-1d SS-1e
Official designation R-11 R-17/R-300
Deployment Date 1957 1964 1965? 1989?
Length 10.7 m 11.25 m 11.25 m 12.29 m
Width 0.88 m 0.88 m 0.88 m 0.88 m
Launch weight 4,400 kg 5,900 kg 6,400 kg 6,500 kg
Range 180 km 300 km 550 km 300 km
Payload 950 kg 985 kg 600 kg 985 kg
Accuracy (CEP) 3000 m 450 m 700 m 50 m

Dopuna: 23 Sep 2011 11:19

nisu još ali vjerovatno će,ako sirija misli nekako ispregovarati povrat teritrija ,moraju biti neka prijetnja inaće mogu zaboraviti golan.vis. je ako misle scud-ovma ,biti neka prijetnja onda bolje neka ih spakuju,bace i na njih okaće 1000$ ,pa bar neka se obraduje onaj ko ih nadje.
Iran has expressed interest in obtaining the system. In May 2009, the President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko, referring to selling the system to Iran, stated: "We will sacredly fulfill our agreements with Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and expect more activity in projects earmarked for joint implementation"
pa sad vidjećemo oće li ispoštovat.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Jeste ali niko jos nije kupio Iskander. Svi kao hoce da ga kupe. Inace Iran je trebao od Belorusa da ga kupi a Belorusi nisu jos kupili od Rusa. Sto ti govori da Rusi i nisu bas zainteresovani da prodaju Iskander Iranu jer sto bi Iranci probali preko Belorusa da ga kupe.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

pa u ovim okolnostima vjreovatno i naće,inaće bjelorusja ne kupuje pa prodaje oni su samo ispostava za države koje su pod sankcijama il bi izravnom prodajom iz rusije narušil ruske odnose sa drugim državama,imaš tih primjera iz prošlosti,to samo prodje kroz bjelorusiju.