|
Poslao: 13 Dec 2015 15:58
|
offline
- gold_digger
- Ugledni građanin
- Pridružio: 30 Mar 2013
- Poruke: 492
|
Nisam mislio dva nova vec su poceli sa izgradnjom drugog nosaca Ford klase.
Pogledaj od trenutka postavljanja kobilice do porinuca broda. Opremanje celog nosaca sigurno traje duze.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 13 Dec 2015 16:26
|
offline
- gold_digger
- Ugledni građanin
- Pridružio: 30 Mar 2013
- Poruke: 492
|
Zamenio slova kod porinuca verovatno filter na sajtu ne dozvoljava da se koriste te reci.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 13 Dec 2015 16:49
|
offline
- nemezisx
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 29 Jun 2009
- Poruke: 3510
|
Ма знам,ал је било забавно  ...јесте има филтер за неке речи на сајту...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 17 Dec 2015 15:11
|
offline
- Toni
- SuperModerator
- Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
- Poruke: 33083
|
Mornarica dobila za sledecu godinu i vise nego sto je trazila
Citat:The bill also adds $1 billion as a partial payment for a future Arleigh Burke-class destroyer (DDG-51) and $635 million for an Expeditionary Mobile Base (formerly called the Afloat Forward Staging Base), and it accelerates long-lead procurement for the LX(R) dock landing ship replacement, the SC(X)R landing craft utility (LCU) replacement and the LHA-8 amphibious assault ship.
These plus-ups to the shipbuilding budget began as an idea from the Senate Armed Services Committee when that panel crafted its version of the National Defense Authorization Act in May. SASC poured an additional $1.7 billion into the shipbuilding budget beyond what the Navy had requested to help get ahead of the major challenge the Navy will face as the Ohio Replacement Program ballistic missile submarine effort ramps up in the coming years ahead of a FY 2021 construction start.
The FY 2016 bill also funds three Littoral Combat Ships, two Virginia-class attack submarines (SSN-774) and two Arleigh Burke destroyers, all of which were included in the Navy’s request.
The bill adds $609 million beyond what the Pentagon asked for in the services’ readiness accounts, adds $200 million beyond the budget request to support the Pentagon’s new “technology offset” effort to maintain a technological edge over near-peer competitors, adds $100 million to assess military weapons systems for cyber threats and vulnerabilities, and adds $30 million for development of new auxiliary oceanographic research vessels.
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 17 Dec 2015 21:04
|
offline
- nemezisx
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 29 Jun 2009
- Poruke: 3510
|
^
Па ако нису тражили,како су знали у конгресу шта треба морнарици... 
Све су то политичк глупости...тј боље рећи по нашке-класична ''грабеж'' пред изборе...
Size matters: Is the U.S. Navy really too small?
Citat:That hasn't stopped the expansion of the Navy from becoming a favorite Republican talking point.
Outlining his policy on China in Charleston, South Carolina, Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida warned, "Our Navy is now smaller than at any time since before World War I."
In the first Republican debate last month, neurosurgeon Ben Carson similarly declared, "Our Navy is the smallest it's been since 1917."
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker in April compared the current number of ships to that under President Ronald Reagan, telling the New Hampshire Republican Leadership Summit, "We're headed down toward 250. That's less than half of where we were under Reagan."
However, Republican hopefuls -- including Rubio, Carson, Walker, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and others -- insist that the U.S. must "rebuild" and "reinvigorate" the Navy by raising its ship count to as high as 350, a project that would likely cost hundreds of billions of dollars.
Citat:"It is a useful bumper sticker," said Dakota Wood, a former U.S. Marine and senior research fellow for defense programs at the Heritage Foundation. "It resonates with people but doesn't go into the details."
мало и претеривања,али генерално...
Citat:"The U.S. Navy is 10 times stronger than all of the other world's navies combined," Easterbrook said. "To say that the Navy is weak because the numbers are going down is classic political nonsense."
How Many Ships Does the US Navy Need?
More Ships Can’t Save Overworked Navy; Basing Ships Abroad Can: CSBA
Pentagon Cuts LCS to 40 Ships, 1 Shipbuilder
Citat:The US Navy's fight to buy 52 variants of its littoral combat ship (LCS) from two shipbuilders may have taken a fatal blow this week after the secretary of defense directed the service to cap its buy at 40 ships and pick only one supplier. The directive also orders the Navy to buy only one ship annually over the next four years, down from three per year.
How Lethal Flying Robots Will Revolutionize the U.S. Navy Surface Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 30 Dec 2015 16:06
|
offline
- Toni
- SuperModerator
- Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
- Poruke: 33083
|
Northrop Grumman wins DARPA TERN programme
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
U pitanju je naoruzana BPL za mornaricu koja ce moci da se lansira sa brodova
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
