Organizacija i upotreba oklopnih i mehanizovanih jedinica

• 1Ovo se svidja korisniku: voja64
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Koncept robotizovanih T-72 u 4 verzije koji bi bili korisceni u urbanim sredinama

Citat:The robotic squad will comprise four robotic variants, including a 50-ton Main Battle Tank that mounts a 125mm cannon with a truncated barrel, improving the tank’s maneuverability in urban terrain. Other modifications will include a 22-round autoloader. Modern multipurpose high-explosive projectiles with delay fusing, enable such guns to penetrate typical urban targets, like buildings and bunkers protected by concrete and brick walls. The truncated barrel, use of lower charges, and, possibly, reshaping the turret layout, enable designers to increase the 125mm gun elevation up from +14 to +20 degrees, improving the tank’s capability to engage targets above street level.

Another variant designed primarily for close-range fire support is a T-72 chassis loaded with a stack of RPO-2 multi-effect rockets. The RPO-2 also known as Shmel-M or Bumblebee entered service in 2004 as a man-portable weapon. It has seen extensive use in recent combat operations (particularly in Syria) where it was used to clear out the enemy in closed terrain, without having to risk close quarters combat. Shmel-M packs a firepower of a 152mm high-explosive artillery projectile using 3kg of thermobaric filler to create the overwhelming blast effect.

A robotic variant of the Terminator fire support vehicle will use a turret mounting two 2A42 30mm cannons, each loaded with 500 rounds. Unlike the manned Terminator, the robotic fire support vehicle will not use anti-tank missiles but use the RPO-2 thermobaric rockets instead. The twin-gun turret offers gun elevation up to +25 degrees, engaging targets at rooftops and high floors.

A fourth variant will be a robotic version of the TOS-1A, a T-72 chassis mounting a launcher stacking 16 NURS 220mm thermobaric rockets (the same used on the manned TOS-1A vehicle).

The unit will be controlled by a manned mission command vehicle, also utilizing a T-72 heavy APC configuration similar to the current BMO-T flamethrower. This vehicle could be remodeled to accommodate a two men crew and six mission controllers. It will also be fitted with an active protection for improved battlefield survivability. This vehicle is expected to be positioned at a distance up to three kilometers from the leading robotic formation.

The datalink connecting the vehicles and command unit is critical, particularly due to the high level of interference experienced in urban areas.

Citat:The ‘Storm’ project comprises four types of vehicles – a T-72B3 tank. The unmanned vehicles will employ robotic functions for autonomous mobility, communications, self-protection, and situational awareness, with high-level mission supervision maintained from a distance by remote operators. Each of the robotic vehicles will be equipped with active protection, dozer blade and remotely controlled 7.62 PKTN machine gun, that will provide the vehicle autonomous mission capabilities such as detect enemy actions, defeat anti-tank attacks, overcoming obstacles and return fire for self-defense.

A robotic platoon differs from the use of a single robotic vehicle as such unit operates similarly to a manned tank platoon. In urban operations, where radio communications are severely degraded, as the Russians experienced with their Uran-9 robotic platforms in Syria. The presence of several connected platforms establishes a more robust link to remote controllers while providing mutual coverage and continuity in the face of enemy resistance.

The level of autonomy for the vehicles has not been detailed publicly but according to analysts, it is likely that the robotic vehicles will have autonomous functions for movement and maneuverability (considered low-level autonomy). Higher level autonomous functions could include obstacle avoidance using movement planning and tools (the dozer blade, for example).

Self-protection should also be automatic, relying on active defense sensors and defeat mechanisms, threat detection, localization and defeat (using active protection and remotely controlled machine guns) can be used. The robotic tanks will also be equipped with means for navigation, and self-orientation to interpret blue-force tracking (BFT) situational pictures to report their status and positions and avoid fratricide. Other functions are likely to be controlled by manned operators.

Mission autonomy could also be employed, to enable tactical moves, such as movement on a route marked by predefined waypoints, and secure or engage enemy designated locations. Other missions could also include deployment of smoke screens in the flanks of the main force.

Optimized for operations in urban terrain the robotic vehicles are equipped with advanced protection (for cost considerations this protection is likely reactive armor), enabling the tank to continue its mission even after absorbing 10-15 from RPGs, mines and improvised explosive charges. Threats of Anti-tank missiles and kinetic tank rounds are less likely in those scenarios. A dozer blade would improve mobility, breach obstacles and shape the terrain to secure positions for the robotics team and the manned elements that will follow.

[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]

• 1Ovo se svidja korisniku: djordje92sm
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Uloguj se preko Facebooka da bi video sliku:

Toni ::

Lijepo objasnjeno ...
Bio je slican video , ne mogu da ga nadjem ...
Uglavnom ovdje je objasnjena taktika probijanja linije , u onom drugom je objasnjenja uloga motorizovanih jedinica ,
I tadasnje poljske pjesadije.... jednostavno stite bokove tenkovima , osiguravaju koridor , snabdjevanje ....dok tenkovi napreduju po dubini....

• 4Ovo se svidja korisnicima: pein, nradukic, voja64, djordje92sm
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Uloguj se preko Facebooka da bi video sliku:

BVP VS Tenk

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Vrhunski prilog sa realnim predstavljanjem mogućnosti nove kupole za BMP-2 Berežok koja bi nama na BVP legla samo da se može upasovati ..

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Nema tu leba. Čak i ako bi mogao da izdrži težinu, ova je dvosed, moralo bi ozbiljno da se radi na preuređenunju unutrašnjosti.

• 1Ovo se svidja korisniku: voja64
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Ili nabaviti BMP sa već montiranom što bi možda bilo bolje e sad količina bi bila simbolična pa bi imao domaći BVP sa Maljutkom i ruski sa Kornetom.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Palo mi je na pamet da je ta kupola za dva člana i suštinski se razlikuje od naše u kojoj je samo oparater pa je verovatno samim tim i teža a verovatno i šira..
Mislio sam da u tom slučaju izbaci funkciju prevoza desanta i bez pešadije da uz vozača i dva člana kupole ima jednog ložača u dodavanju municije kod popune i sl al..LOVA..
BVP-2 koji je za remont polovan nije veliki trošak + ova kupola+ domaća pamet = naš domaći lovac tenkova
Na to sam mislio ali sam sa mobilnog bio nedorelen..

• 1Ovo se svidja korisniku: voja64
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Uloguj se preko Facebooka da bi video sliku:

Napisano: 28 Jan 2020 7:22

Oko 3 t tezina?


Dopuna: 30 Jan 2020 5:09

Mada cuda radi.
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]

Nase BVP u OT, dobro oklopiti a ovo i derivaciju za vozila podrske....

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
Delić obuke iz Rusije bilo bi lepo kad bi se i kod nas barem toliko primenilo mnogo bolje od čišćenja kruga i zanimljivije vojniku na dobrovoljnom služenju vojnog roka.