|
Poslao: 11 Jul 2017 15:35
|
offline
- voja64
- Stručni saradnik foruma
- Pridružio: 10 Okt 2012
- Poruke: 25904
|
Opšta poplava novih proizvođača lansea za davno izrađene RPG-7 projektile.
Dodaju im samo razne džidža midže a u Yugi se od ovog 40mm odustalo u korist domaćeg RB M-57.
Sad ga proizvodi i PPT a bome i TRZ Hagdžići i valda BNT.
|
|
|
|
|
Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 23 Jul 2017 23:13
|
offline
- voja64
- Stručni saradnik foruma
- Pridružio: 10 Okt 2012
- Poruke: 25904
|
Pa pogledaj Autora Lukaš Visingr a naš VPU je samo preneo tekst...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 27 Jul 2017 19:12
|
|
|
Evo napokon i RPG7 iz TRZ Hadzici da ugleda svjetlo dana.
Interesantna pozicija one Zrakove nisanske sprave. Ne moras glavu naginjati u stranu kad nisanis.
U drvenom sanduku je jos nesto kao nozice ali se ne vidi najbolje.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 30 Jul 2017 09:59
|
offline
- Pridružio: 09 Jan 2012
- Poruke: 35615
|
Предприятия группы ГК «Укроборонпром» разработали новое термобарическое оружие: пехотный огнемет и гранаты.
Источник: [Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 31 Jul 2017 10:24
|
offline
- voja64
- Stručni saradnik foruma
- Pridružio: 10 Okt 2012
- Poruke: 25904
|
Panzerschreck
The 8,8cm R PzB 54 with its small mother, the US M1 Rocket Launcher
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
Ein Kriegskind
"A child of war". The history of the Panzerschreck is fascinating since it was developed as an entirely new weapon system and fielded in less than 6 months. The following text was printed in the "Von der Front für die Front" issued on 6 June 1944 by the Oberkommando des Heeres (translated by myself...).
Important notes about the Panzerschreck (Ofenrohr)
The following has been reported by the Heereswaffenamt: With the fielding of the R Pz B 54 (also called Ofenrohr) a huge amount of suggestions for improvements of the weapon has been received from the units. The Panzerschreck is a "child of war". The development of the weapon had to be done very fast, in order to give the units a simple but good weapon to fight against tanks as fast as possible. To avoid a delay in the distribution of the weapon certain shortcomings is the price to pay. The need for a gasmask in order to protect the firer from the rearward flying powder particles during the firing is just one example.
Development and history
By 1943 the pre-war anti-tank rifles had all gone out of fashion as their combat value was all gone. The same was happening to the towed Anti-Tank guns, which were heavy, cumbersome and slow to move, expensive and just not very efficient at all. They all fired a standard Armour Piercing (AP) round that depended on the mass-energy (weight of projectile combined with velocity) to break through armour. Development of the tanks showing up on the battlefield in 1943 had taken this into consideration, and thicker armour combined with sloping sides made it a tough job to kill a tank with an AT gun or a PAK (Panzer Abwehr Kanone). The shaped-charge principle was well known at the time, and the Germans used it for demolition charges and magnetic anti-tank charges. It was not possible to use in a grenade delivered from a rifled barrel though, as the spin of the grenade needed to stabilize it in its flight would remove the effect of the shaped-charge when it impacted. In late 1942/early 1943 German engineers developed a new AT weapon that would use the shaped-charge principle in a High Explosive Anti-Tank (HEAT) fin-stabilized grenade propelled by a rocket motor. The system developed was called the Raketenwerfer 43, "Puppchen". It fired a HEAT grenade from a closed breech and was mounted on a carriage that could help absorb the recoil.
29 "Raketenwerfer 43" captured by the Red Army
The grenade was designated 8,8cm Raketen Panzer Granat 4312 (8,8cm R Pz Gr 4312) and was fired using a percussion cap to ignite the rocket motor. During flight it was stabilized by fins contained within a drum on the tail section.
The flange at the rear end is in fact a very short casing that contained the primer and would ensure that the gases didn't escape to the rear but all contributed to the propulsion of the grenade.
It was a common misconception that the Puppchen fired the same grenades as the Raketen Panzer Büchse 54 that was developed at the same time. A switch between the two weapons would be entirely impossible as they used different ignition systems and had a different tailfin. The misconception is mostly due to the fact that captured examples of the Raketenwerfer 43 seldom had any ammunition, while the similar looking Raketen Panzer Büchse 54 ammunition seems to have been readily available. Note that the US soldier above is holding the longer RPzBGr 4322 for the Raketen Panzer Büchse 54.
US "Garritroopers" inspect captured Puppchens. Note the presence of the wrong ammunition in both pictures!
Nastaviću ceo tekst ako mislite da vredi..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 31 Jul 2017 14:38
|
offline
- Pridružio: 31 Dec 2011
- Poruke: 20383
|
voja64 ::...
Nastaviću ceo tekst ako mislite da vredi..
Vredi i te kako.
Slicno kao sto su nemci Nemci od RPzB dobili RW43, Sovjeti su od SPG-9 dobili 2A28 topce na BMP-1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
