|
Poslao: 08 Jun 2016 17:51
|
offline
- Gavrilo Milentijević
- Komandir stanice milicije Gornje Polje
- Pridružio: 12 Feb 2005
- Poruke: 37311
- Gde živiš: ovalni kabinet
|
Nisam našao adekvatnu temu za ovo pa postavljam ovde - Jumbo armour na tenku Šerman i efekat/učinak raznih projektila na isti...
Citat:The M4A3E2 Jumbo was an Assault Tank variant of the M4A3 Sherman, it had increased frontal armor aswell as increase turret armor, most were armed with the 75mm gun, while some were armed with the harder hitting 76mm HVC, like seen in the 4th picture.
The bottom picture shows the effectiveness of the Jumbo’s Armor.
|
|
|
|
|
Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
|
|
|
Poslao: 06 Jul 2016 17:37
|
offline
- Gavrilo Milentijević
- Komandir stanice milicije Gornje Polje
- Pridružio: 12 Feb 2005
- Poruke: 37311
- Gde živiš: ovalni kabinet
|
Ukrajinski ERO naziva Nož
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 16 Avg 2016 17:18
|
offline
- Toni

- SuperModerator
- Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
- Poruke: 32589
|
Citat:The Russian defence industry has developed a slat armour system designed for tracked and wheeled armoured fighting vehicles (AFV) for enhanced survivability against anti-tank weapons fitted with a single high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) warhead.
These include the PG-7 rocket fired by the RPG-7, PG-9S fired by the tripod mounted SPG-9, as well as the PG18 disposable anti-tank weapon.
The slat armour can be installed on the Russian BTR-60, BTR-70 and BTR-80 8x8 amphibious armoured personnel carriers (APCs), the BMP-1 and BMP-2 tracked infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs), and the 4x4 BRDM-2 amphibious scout car.
Citat:
According to the manufacturer, around 90% of the front, 80% of the side, and 90% of the BTR-80 is protected. If required the roof could also be fitted with slat armour that would protect 60% of the front, and 100% of the sides and rear.
The weight of the package depends on the platform it is fitted to but is understood to be typically between 800 and 1,100 kg.
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 23 Okt 2016 01:13
|
offline
- Pridružio: 31 Dec 2011
- Poruke: 21703
|
Prvi je delimicno tacan (K-1 malo vredi protiv tandem kumulativne). Omasio je:
- da i K-5 isto nije "mega" protiv tandem kumulativne.
- cinjenicu da ima dosta sredstava koji nemaju tandem-kumulativne BG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|