Suhoj Su-35 "poslednji Flanker"

6

Suhoj Su-35 "poslednji Flanker"

offline
  • Toni  Male
  • SuperModerator
  • How bad do you want it
  • Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
  • Poruke: 25183
  • Gde živiš: Petrovgrad

Jos jedan mnogo dobar prikaz

http://www.knaapo.ru/media/News/maks2007/su35eng.swf



Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
offline
  • Toni  Male
  • SuperModerator
  • How bad do you want it
  • Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
  • Poruke: 25183
  • Gde živiš: Petrovgrad

Sukhoi Su-35 "4++ Generation Flanker"

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/su-35/su-35.htm



offline
  • Pridružio: 20 Sep 2008
  • Poruke: 781

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmNkm45gTco&feature=related

radarski sistem su-35

offline
  • Pridružio: 12 Feb 2007
  • Poruke: 8248

Mare_m76 ::http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmNkm45gTco&feature=related

radarski sistem su-35


Da si malo bolje pogledao link koji je dao TOP GUN video bi da se to isto tamo nalazi i još se bolje vidi!

TOP GUN ::Jos jedan mnogo dobar prikaz

http://www.knaapo.ru/media/News/maks2007/su35eng.swf

offline
  • Pridružio: 03 Apr 2008
  • Poruke: 5619

KB Suhoj je potvrdio da Su-35 ulazi u sastav ruskog vazduhoplovstva 2011

http://en.rian.ru/russia/20090219/120219966.html

offline
  • Toni  Male
  • SuperModerator
  • How bad do you want it
  • Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
  • Poruke: 25183
  • Gde živiš: Petrovgrad

Moram izdvojiti ovaj deo
Citat:"The current progress of the Su-35 testing program confirms the earlier announced timeframe for the deliveries of the aircraft to Russian and foreign customers in 2011," the company said in a statement.
Very Happy Razz

offline
  • Pridružio: 30 Jun 2007
  • Poruke: 6136
  • Gde živiš: Novi Sad, severna Srbija

Мотори Су35БМ, под ознаком 117.




online
  • Taso  Male
  • Super građanin
  • Pridružio: 28 Maj 2008
  • Poruke: 1089
  • Gde živiš: Terra Australis

aerodrom ::Da li neko zna zasto noviji primerci Su-35BM i Su-30 imaju crni okvir oko kokpita?
Pretpostavljam da je u pitanju "stealth" premaz i zastita?


U vezi 'stealth' premaza, naisao sam na sledece

Citat:Russian Stealth You Can Touch

Checking out the Zhuk-M1E radar at Aero-India - the new unit developed by Phazotron for the MiG-29M, MiG-29K and upgrades - one detail was obvious: the backside of the radome and the front of the bulkhead were covered with what looked like something you'd clean the barbecue with.



It's radar-absorbent material (RAM) and pretty effective RAM at that. Nothing very exotic, but it does not need to be, since it is sealed up inside the radome and protected from aerodynamic forces, heat and moisture. In fact, US RAM specialists Emerson & Cuming sell a very similar product on the open market, an open-cell plastic foam doped with carbon absorber.

Russians are not stupid and do not do things if there is no point, and there would not be a lot of point in dealing with the radar-cross section (RCS) hotspot from the radar antenna if they had not also dealt with the other sore-thumb hotspots, namely the inlets/compressor faces and the cockpit.



The technology to do this was described in detail in technical papers delivered in London some years ago by representatives from the ITAE research institute, who had applied it to the Su-27 family. ITAE had even worked out how to apply RAM directly to the first-stage fan blades, which is quite a neat trick, and had devised spray-on RAM for missiles.

One may assume these or similar measures are available to MiG.

The same kind of measures are also used on many Western aircraft, but are usually not shown in detail unless someone screws up:



Whoops. That's a Have Glass II F-16 and the white plastic shroud around the radar workings is RAM.

Reducing the front-sector RCS, mostly in X-band, is a far cry from full-up stealth technology. It does not make the aircraft invisible. But what it does do (and quite effectively) is make jamming more effective by reducing the burn-through range (the point at which a radar defeats jamming because the reflection is stronger than the jamming signal).

The lesson: Any combat-effectiveness comparisons that are based on the old standard for the nose-on RCS of a fighter - around 5 m2 - can be considered invalid.

Preuzeto od:
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.....0a81179c86



Ovo gore je za Mig-29 ali isto verovatno vazi i za SU-35....jos nesto zanimljivo vezano za Mig-29K. Obratite paznju na zig-zag sar koje su navodno deo mera o smanjenju radarskog odraza

offline
  • Toni  Male
  • SuperModerator
  • How bad do you want it
  • Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
  • Poruke: 25183
  • Gde živiš: Petrovgrad

Lepota Razz




Malo sa Maksa
http://www.knaapo.ru/eng/gallery/aircrafts/combat/su-35/su-35_at_maks-2007.wbp

offline
  • Kos93  Male
  • Legendarni građanin
  • Pridružio: 11 Sep 2007
  • Poruke: 6545

Nadam se da ova nije bila.

Ko je trenutno na forumu
 

Ukupno su 592 korisnika na forumu :: 7 registrovanih, 2 sakrivenih i 583 gosta   ::   [ Administrator ] [ Supermoderator ] [ Moderator ] :: Detaljnije

Najviše korisnika na forumu ikad bilo je 2918 - dana 22 Nov 2019 07:48

Korisnici koji su trenutno na forumu:
Korisnici trenutno na forumu: 4channer, bojank, Despot1, havoc995, raykan, Sass Drake, Taso