F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Hvala vam.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Russia is About to Get A Close Look at the F-35 Stealth Fighter
September 27, 2019 - by David Axe fir

Italy has become the first country to deploy F-35 stealth fighters for NATO's air-policing missions.

Italian F-35As belonging to the Italian air force's 13° Gruppo, 32° Stormo are on track to take over the air-policing mission in Iceland, David Cenciotti reported at The Aviationist on Sept. 25, 2019.



[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

^^Vest je bila na prosloj strani sa slikama



Novo odlaganje....
New Flaw Delays F-35 Operational Testing to 2020
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]

• 1Ovo se svidja korisniku: 4channer
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Stealthy no more? A German radar vendor says it tracked the F-35 jet in 2018 — from a pony farm
Citat:In the illustrious history of the F-35 fighter jet, add a pony farm outside Berlin as the place where one company claims the plane’s stealth cover was blown.
The story that follows is a snapshot in the cat-and-mouse game between combat aircraft — designed to be undetectable by radar — and sensor makers seeking to undo that advantage. In the case of the F-35, the promise of invisibility to radar is so pronounced that it has colored much of the jet's employment doctrine, lending an air of invincibility to the weapon: The enemy never saw it coming.
But technology leaps only last so long, and Russia and China are known to be working on technology aimed at nixing whatever leg up NATO countries have tried to build for themselves.
Now, German radar-maker Hensoldt claims to have tracked two F-35s for 150 kilometers following the 2018 Berlin Air Show in Germany in late April of that year. The company’s passive radar system, named TwInvis, is but one of an emerging generation of sensors and processors so sensitive and powerful that it promises to find previously undetectable activities in a given airspace.
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

F35 leti sa radarskim reflektorom nije cudno da su ga pratili.

• 2Ovo se svidja korisnicima: jazbar, 4channer
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Raptor1 ::F35 leti sa radarskim reflektorom nije cudno da su ga pratili.
Rec je o ovom uredjaju: [Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
Radi se analiza VHF radio i TV signala (DAB i DVB-T), jer avion prolaskom kroz etar remeti iste.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Na pasivnu detekciju (pelengaciju) t.z. stelth zmaja nema učinka.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

djox ::Stealthy no more? A German radar vendor says it tracked the F-35 jet in 2018 — from a pony farm
Citat:In the illustrious history of the F-35 fighter jet, add a pony farm outside Berlin as the place where one company claims the plane’s stealth cover was blown.
The story that follows is a snapshot in the cat-and-mouse game between combat aircraft — designed to be undetectable by radar — and sensor makers seeking to undo that advantage. In the case of the F-35, the promise of invisibility to radar is so pronounced that it has colored much of the jet's employment doctrine, lending an air of invincibility to the weapon: The enemy never saw it coming.
But technology leaps only last so long, and Russia and China are known to be working on technology aimed at nixing whatever leg up NATO countries have tried to build for themselves.
Now, German radar-maker Hensoldt claims to have tracked two F-35s for 150 kilometers following the 2018 Berlin Air Show in Germany in late April of that year. The company’s passive radar system, named TwInvis, is but one of an emerging generation of sensors and processors so sensitive and powerful that it promises to find previously undetectable activities in a given airspace.
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]

znaci nema f35 za nemce i odma se objavljuje pljuvacina? ionako ga nikada nisu hteli (cuveni slucaj ursule i generala kome je pretila pre dve god da ako jos jednom spomene taj avion dobice otkaz jer nabavka aviona nije vojno nego politicko pitanje u koje se on ne razume)..

sto to nisu objavili jos 2018, sledeci dan kad se to dogodilo?

i jedno je detektovati nesto kad znas da ce tamo da prodje a drugo je kad te napadaju sa svih strana pa ne znas ni gde ti glava a ne nesto drugo da filozofiras.

• 3Ovo se svidja korisnicima: voja64, miodrag, ssekir75
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Pa žena je potpuno u pravu to je pre svega političko pitanje. U Belgiji kad se pokazalo da ni u ludilu na poštenom tenderu F-35 ne može da pobedi Tajfuna, po prvobitno postavljenim TTZ, oni usred tendera promene taktičko tehničke zahteve i umesto više namenskog aviona kao primarni zadatak postave borbu sa ruskim sistemima PVO. Postave zahteve koji važe za EF-18. Uz to promene NATO pravila obračunavanja cene aviona pa otprilike 40% cene prebace na investicije u infrastrukturu koja ne bi bila neophodna za Tajfune. I onda gle čuda F-35 ispadne čak i jeftiniji jer je otprilike 40% cene aviona kako se obračunava po NATO standardima POLITIČKOM odlukom prebačeno u infrastrukturna ulaganja.

• 1Ovo se svidja korisniku: Miloje
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

ltcolonel ::Pa žena je potpuno u pravu to je pre svega političko pitanje. U Belgiji kad se pokazalo da ni u ludilu na poštenom tenderu F-35 ne može da pobedi Tajfuna, na prvobitno postavljenim TTZ oni usred tendera promene taktičko tehničke zahteve i umesto više namenskog aviona kao primarni zadatak postave borbu sa ruskim sistemima PVO. Postave zahteve koji važe za EF-18. Uz to promene NATO pravila obračunavanja cene aviona pa otprilike 40% cene prebace na investicije u infrastrukturu koja ne bi bila neophodna za Tajfune. I onda gle čuda F-35 ispadne čak i jeftiniji jer je otprilike 40% cene aviona kako se obračunava po NATO standardima POLITIČKOM odlukom prebačeno u infrastrukturna ulaganja.

onda se bolje zapitati zasto belgijanci,holandjani,poljaci,norvezani, italijani itd hoce nesto sto nemci ne zele..

toliko o eu..svima pocinje da bude dosta nemackog pametovanja o svemu i svacamu pa se politicki vezuju za amere jos vise.. umesto da svi u evropi zajednicki i slozno razviju i koriste jedan 100% evropski avion vecina bezi od toga ko djavo od krsta..izgleda da im je draze da im naredjuje blesavi amer ko tramp nego da izvrsavaju nemacke zelje..