MiG-29 Fulcrum

• 1Ovo se svidja korisniku: Sim.a
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Хекторе, поента коју си хтео да нагласиш је јасна, али молим те - не повлачи више паралеле са спортом...

Која је прича иза ове фотографије?

• 5Ovo se svidja korisnicima: Hektor, voja64, Skywhaler, pedja63, ray ban11
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Skywhaler ::Која је прича иза ове фотографије?

Andreas Klein u knjizi Luftwaffe Fulcrums iz 2002. navodi da je to nemački 29+07 (s/n 29605525115) koji je 29.09.1993. u bazi Decimomannu na Sardiniji ostao bez poklopca kabine prilikom poletanja.

• 6Ovo se svidja korisnicima: Sim.a, Skywhaler, bojank, Joja, ssekir75, nradukic
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Ograničenja postoje, ali se ona reflektuju pre svega statistički. Npr. prosečna žena je fizički slabija i sitnija od prosečnog muškarca ali nisu sve žene slabije od svih muškaraca. Odnosno kad je reč o teškim fizičkim poslovima npr. biće sigurno više muškaraca sposobnih da ih rade ali to ne znači da nema i određeni broj žena koje isto to mogu i ne znači da im treba zabraniti da probaju da se dokažu. Ako je neko sposoban da ispuni sve postavljene zahteve za pilota MiG-29, savršeno me ne zanima da li je muškarac, žena, Srbin, Rom, Bošnjak, Mađar i sl. Bitno je da je ispunio uslove i da vojska bude institucija gde svi imaju iste šanse i iste kriterijume bez obzira na pol i poreklo. Prvi razlog je da bi apsolutno i uvek imala samo najbolje kadrove birane na osnovu merljivih, objektivnih kriterijuma a drugi je da bi bila prava, istinska narodna institucija koja sve tretira isto i kojoj svi građani veruju.

• 1Ovo se svidja korisniku: voja64
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

..nego vracam se u temu, sto je ovom otpao krov kabine, na migovima to ne odlece samo od sebe slucajno

• 4Ovo se svidja korisnicima: Hektor, pedja63, 13892, Luka
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Cuj `Kabrio`

Evo jos jedne slike 29tke `kabrioleta`

Citat:That mishap happened to a German Fulcrum in Sardegna in 1998. The pilot was able to land safely.



Ima i ovaj detalj

Citat:10 g !!



Na cuvenom sajtu :

http://www.fabulousfulcrums.de/index_e.html

Je li se meni cini da ispod kabine pise cirilicom GTI sa crvenom strelicom ...

• 2Ovo se svidja korisnicima: voja64, ray ban11
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Добро видиш име, пише ГТИ....

• 4Ovo se svidja korisnicima: shmele, StefanNBG90, ray ban11, carpbuster
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Citat:Авиадартс 2018
МиГ-29СМТ с блоками НАР С-8.
МиГ-29СМТ ВВС RF-92942 / 30 красный
Рязань - Дягилево,
май 2018
http://aviapressphoto.com/928/

• 6Ovo se svidja korisnicima: sasans23, Mercury, voja64, ray ban11, MileSA, carpbuster
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Ispade da je otpornost na g opterecenje najvaznija stavka. Ja cu vam reci sta su dve tri stvari najvaznje za pulota lovca.
1. Nije sklon filizofiranju nego izucavanju letelice i njenih mgucnosti i zahteva.
2. Dobar vid i urodjena sposobnost za orjentaciju u prostoru pi sve tri dimenzije.
3.Agresivnost.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Citat:CONCLUSIONS
There is historical evidence that women are capable of being excellent aviators. Although women have been integrated into many aspects of military flying, they remain restricted from certain combat aircraft and missions. There are some differences between males and females in the general population in cognitive performance testing, but the magnitude of male/female differences is not great. The sex-related differences although statistically significant, account for only a very small part of the population variance- Hyde estimates that these differences account for no more than 1% to 5% of the variance within the population. Moreover, the validity of using these differences to predict aviation performance is unknown. Pilot training attrition may be too variable and insensitive a criterion on which to base generalizations about female aptitude.
Although cognitive performance and good judgment are perhaps the most important attributes of a military pilot, the ability of current selection tests to predict these attributes in either men or women has not been demonstration.
Anatomy and physiology present no insurmountable problems to females participating in military aviation. Pratical considerations such as urin collection are being addressed and do not appear to be an insurmountable obstacle. The Strategic Air Command Scientific Advisory Board in studying the integration of female pilots into U-2/TR-1 flying determined that urination and menstruation would be satisfactorily handled by the DACT and tampons. The effect of hormonal fluctuation on performance is complex and poorly understood; studies need to take into account the type of performance being studied, the level of training of the subjects, the use of exogenous hormone, as well as the phase of the menstrual cycle. Because female performance might vary at various parts of the menstrual cycle or on oral contraceptives, this might result in a wider range of performance among female subjects. Most studies of performance reviewed did not accurately define the hormonal status (time of the menstrual cycle, use of oral contraceptives, etc.) of the subjects.
While the average female is less aerobically fit than the average male, selected females are capable of degrees of aerobic fitness equal to males. For overall fitness, V0 2 max is predictive of ability to do prolonged work irrespective of sex.
Most anthropometric and strength problems faced by females are a result of aircraft being designed for men rather than for women. The issues are political, economic, and engineering rather than medical. It seems appropriate and feasible to devise size and strength standards, irrespective of sex, for aviation candidates. Men are, on the average, larger and stronger than women although there are large variations within each sex and a large overlap between the sexes. Most of the observed male/female differences in work
performance, injury rate, etc., disappear when size, strength, and fitness are
controlled for. Size criterion for flying duties is more a policy and economic
decision than a medical one. Building cockpits to accommodate a wider size
range will obviously entail engineering difficulties and costs.In their respective responses to aeromedical stressors, several minor differences of questionable operational significance may exist between men and women. One aeromedical stressor currently causing significant operational losses is +Gz acceleration forces (G-induced loss of
consciousness). There is no significant difference between males and females
in tolerance to up to +7 Gz. As it is possible that the less muscular females
would have difficulty with higher G levels, studies of tolerances above +7 Gz need to be accomplished. Studies on the effect of weightlessness on acceleration tolerance and of motion sickness have been inconclusive, possibly due to the small sample sizes of the studies. Women may be more susceptible than men to motion sickness.
Moot of the studies discussed addressing decompression sickness are not published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Some of these studies have flawed methodology, such as relying on mail surveys with low or unknown response rates or comparing populations that are not really comparable in other respects (for example, comparing female flight nurses with male pilots). Rudge, however, convincingly demonstrated that females may have an increased susceptibility to decompression sickness during and just
after the menses. This is unlikely to be operationally significant in aviation
although it may be significant in certain selected exposures such as deep water diving or extra-vehicular activity during space flight. More research into this area is needed.
Females tolerate subacute and chronic hypoxia better than males. This is more likely to be of significance in travel to high terrestrial altitudes (mountains) than in aviation. The possible sex-related differences in heat and cold tolerance are unlikely to be of operational significance except during the unlikely event of a survival situation just at the limits of human tolerance. Even these small differences tend to disappear when fitness and body composition are controlled for.
There are important differences between men and women in their susceptibility to various diseases. Women are apparently more at risk of radiation-induced cancer. Women may be less prone than men to sudden incapacitation. However, they may be subject to more temporary restrictions
from flying duties. This would be especially true if down-time due to pregnancy is counted. The major concern with regard to the fetus is radiation exposure in high altitude/space flight. Other possible dangers include exposure to decompression sickness and extreme heat. Pregnancy also probably would
increase female susceptibility to sudden incapacitation and perhaps lower +Gz
tolerance.
It is recommended that research efforts to develop cognitive, psychomotor, and psychological tests to select aviators should continue. Valid tests could then be applied to both males and females to select the small sub-group suitable for military aviation. Selection criteria should address size, strength, and fitness requirements without reference to sex. Pregnancy and the possibility of fetal damage in the early stages of pregnancy (before diagnosis of pregnancy) appears to be perhaps the biggest single medical concern in allowing women unrestricted access to all aviation/space related careers.

• 1Ovo se svidja korisniku: ray ban11
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Sve to moze sa manjim g da se pistigne, nema silovanja.