|
Poslao: 24 Apr 2012 21:42
|
offline
- djox

- djox
- Pridružio: 23 Nov 2010
- Poruke: 111992
|
Dopuna AF-4 od strane avio tankera KC-10.
Malo je i naoruzan...
April 2012

|
|
|
|
|
Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 25 Apr 2012 01:05
|
offline
- mean_machine
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 23 Dec 2006
- Poruke: 12648
|
Kako bi mu dobro legali nosaci na vrhovima krila. Znam da je bilo neke price da bi nosac na vrhu krila kompromitovao stelt, meni to vise deluje kao izgovor da ne bi morali da se trude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 25 Apr 2012 18:53
|
offline
- presetar
- Počasni građanin
- Pridružio: 30 Dec 2011
- Poruke: 802
|
mean-machine trude se oni ko blesavi,samo su zaboravili da se avion ne pravi preko noci/naravno kvalitetan i ispitan sa strogo odredjenim naletima protke/.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 25 Apr 2012 20:11
|
offline
- mean_machine
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 23 Dec 2006
- Poruke: 12648
|
Ma gde je napravljen preko noci. Rastegli su ga samo tako i to je glavni problem sa ovim avionom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 25 Apr 2012 22:37
|
offline
- Futurama

- Građanin
- Pridružio: 02 Jan 2012
- Poruke: 292
|
mean_machine ::Kako bi mu dobro legali nosaci na vrhovima krila. Znam da je bilo neke price da bi nosac na vrhu krila kompromitovao stelt, meni to vise deluje kao izgovor da ne bi morali da se trude.
Nosaci ispod krila pod uglom od 90* u odnosu na krilo definitivno ne predstavljaju stelt resenje. Mozda donekle sa frontalnog aspekta i u X opsegu ali u L opsegu definitivno mnogo povecavaju RCS da bi se mogao nazvati stelt lovcem. Mislim da je ovo konfiguracija za kako kazu "permissive environment" .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 01 Maj 2012 01:59
|
offline
- Khaless
- Legendarni građanin
- Pridružio: 08 Sep 2005
- Poruke: 5726
|
F-35 je tolika katastrofa da ga nazivaju
"Leteći klavir" i "Avion koji je pojeo Pentagon"
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
Citat:The F-35 isn't only expensive -- it's way behind schedule. The first plan was to have an initial batch of F-35s available for combat in 2010. Then first deployment was to be 2012. More recently, the military services have said the deployment date is "to be determined." A new target date of 2019 has been informally suggested in testimony -- almost 10 years late.
If the F-35's performance were spectacular, it might be worth the cost and wait. But it is not. Even if the aircraft lived up to its original specifications -- and it will not -- it would be a huge disappointment. The reason it is such a mediocrity also explains why it is unaffordable and, for years to come, unobtainable.
F-35 nazivaju "mediokritetom"
Citat:This grotesquely unpromising plan has already resulted in multitudes of problems -- and 80 percent of the flight testing remains. A virtual flying piano, the F-35 lacks the F-16's agility in the air-to-air mode and the F-15E's range and payload in the bombing mode, and it can't even begin to compare to the A-10 at low-altitude close air support for troops engaged in combat. Worse yet, it won't be able to get into the air as often to perform any mission -- or just as importantly, to train pilots -- because its complexity prolongs maintenance and limits availability. The aircraft most like the F-35, the F-22, was able to get into the air on average for only 15 hours per month in 2010 when it was fully operational. (In 2011, the F-22 was grounded for almost five months and flew even less.)
- F-16 je agilniji u cazdušnoj borbi
- F-15 ima veći dolet i nosi više tereta.
- A-10 je neuporedivo bolji u podrški jedinicama KoV
|
|
|
|
|
|