Lockheed Martin/Boeing F-22 Raptor

92

Lockheed Martin/Boeing F-22 Raptor

offline
  • jazbar 
  • Legendarni građanin
  • Pridružio: 28 Dec 2009
  • Poruke: 14935
  • Gde živiš: Lublana

Verovatno mu netreba stelt dok ne dođe do granice dometa radara neprijatelja. Tek tada odbaci rezervoare.



Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
offline
  • Pridružio: 23 Dec 2006
  • Poruke: 12257

jazbar ::Verovatno mu netreba stelt dok ne dođe do granice dometa radara neprijatelja. Tek tada odbaci rezervoare.

Kazu da odbacuje i šine na kojima su tankovi.



offline
  • Pridružio: 26 Mar 2009
  • Poruke: 4955
  • Gde živiš: Šid

jedna od lepsih

razlika izmedju yf-22 i f-22


Dopuna: 28 Jul 2010 22:07

mali dodatak....

offline
  • Pridružio: 17 Maj 2008
  • Poruke: 11586
  • Gde živiš: Srbija

offline
  • Pridružio: 03 Sep 2009
  • Poruke: 1845
  • Gde živiš: Zemun

Raptor u 2010-oj.





offline
  • Pridružio: 05 Apr 2009
  • Poruke: 3815
  • Gde živiš: JAGODINA

offline
  • Pridružio: 06 Jul 2009
  • Poruke: 3216
  • Gde živiš: Novi Sad




"All informations come from reports to US congress made by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) or Lockheed Martin. GAO is known as "the investigative arm of Congress" and "the congressional watchdog" - their job is to keep control on big government projects like the F22.

Google the report-sources given in the video, if you doubt any of the claims, or go to http://www.gao.gov and write the report name in search.

Some of the relevant reports:

2007 - "Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs" - GAO-07-406SP
(read page 87-88 in adope):
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07406sp...
(Regardless of the claim in the "2001 report" below, the F22 still fly less than 1 hour between maintaince in 2007, and this 2007 report also confirms the 2 structural failures etc.)

June 20, 2006 - Subject: Tactical Aircraft: DOD Should Present a New F-22A Business Case before Making Further Investments
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06455r.pdf
Read page 5: "In other words, the unit procurement costs increase from $166 million per aircraft to $183 million per aircraft for the proposed multiyear contract."

GAO-04-391 (2004) "F/A-22 Aircraft"
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04391.pdf
read e.g. page 12. "Current processors are old and obsolete, cannot be supported, and do not have sufficient capacity to meet the increased processing demands required for planned new air-to-ground capabilities beyond Global StrikeEnhanced....."

March 2004 - Changing Conditions Drive Need for New F/A-22 Business Case
http://www.gao.gov/highlights/d04391h...

GAO-01-310 (2001) Tactical Aircraft:
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01310.pdf
(read e.g. 25-26)
" the Air Force estimates that by the end of development, the F-22 will be able to complete 2 flying hours between maintenance actions; and when the F-22 reaches maturity in 2008, F-22s will be able to complete 3 flying hours between maintenance actions. However, currently the flight-test aircraft are completing 0.6 flying hours between maintenance actions. This means that aircraft are now requiring significantly more maintenance than is expected when the system reaches maturity."

offline
  • Pridružio: 26 Maj 2009
  • Poruke: 3384
  • Gde živiš: Sremski Karlovci, Srbija

Langley AFB dobija dodatnih sest Raptora cime ce na raspologanju imati ukupno 42 primerka.Trenutno raspolaze sa dva skvadrona od po 18 aviona.

Arrow http://www.wavy.com/dpp/military/Langley-Air-Force.....2-aircraft

offline
  • Toni  Male
  • SuperModerator
  • How bad do you want it
  • Pridružio: 18 Jun 2008
  • Poruke: 22959
  • Gde živiš: Petrovgrad

Izgleda da su ipak odlucili da ostave masineriju. E sad, da li ce biti ostavljena zbog buducih nadogradnji ili dodatnih aviona u buducnosti, videcemo...

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/07/30/34.....e-use.html

offline
  • Pridružio: 03 Sep 2009
  • Poruke: 1845
  • Gde živiš: Zemun

Ima se, moze se. A nije mi jasno kad i sami znaju da ce iz nekih razloga narucivati dodatne avione ali... Uvek iz nekog razloga zafali, medjutim sto bi od poreskih obveznika uzimali manju cifru kad mogu vecu, pametna politika. Nego mora da su ih ovi nasi malo poducavali na skupovima kako se uvek ali bas uvek i u sve lepo ugraditi. A da bi to postigao uvek uzmes u obzir najskuplju soluciju. Ako Ruje krenu sa Pak-Fa kako najavljuju, ovi ce naruciti jos makar im netrebalo samo da ovi nemaju znatno veci broj. Bilo bi totalno debilno razmontiravanje proizvodnje jer bi je onda ponovo, iznova sklapali, a ubedjen sam da ce ih narucivati - u kom god broju - u buducnosti.

Ko je trenutno na forumu
 

Ukupno su 623 korisnika na forumu :: 31 registrovanih, 1 sakriven i 591 gosta   ::   [ Administrator ] [ Supermoderator ] [ Moderator ] :: Detaljnije

Najviše korisnika na forumu ikad bilo je 2918 - dana 22 Nov 2019 07:48

Korisnici koji su trenutno na forumu:
Korisnici trenutno na forumu: A.R.Chafee.Jr., Alojz Hauptman, Apok, aramis s, awathorn, Bane san, bato, comi_pfc, dakota, Drug pukovnik, duskovuk63, ILGromovnik, indja, janezek67, JOntra, Kaplar2, MaksicZoran, MarKhan, Metanoja, Milan.1976, mnn2, operniki, RecA, rodoljub, Srki94, Srna, Trpe Grozni, vasa.93, vathra, vobo, zlaya011